05.11
Here are point-by-point notes from February’s LaFayette City Council meeting, with our commentary following in italics. City Council meetings are normally held at 7:30 PM on the second Monday of each month. Notes from the March meeting and video from April and May will be posted soon.
February Meeting: February 14, 2011
No reason for the absences were given, but the meeting was held on Valentine’s day so Hodge, Swanson, and Womack were likely spending time with their significant others. A minimal number of city employees and only two or three citizen observers were at the meeting, so it was understandably quite short.
Primary customer for the gas service would be 42 chicken houses off Foster Mill, but 50 to 70 homes will also be reached by the new gas lines “if they want it.” (So far only two residential customers have requested the service.) Councilman Bill Craig says chicken houses may not use gas service due to availability of “chicken poop burning” equipment being introduced. Arnold claims city will recover its costs in 4-1/2 years and benefit from increased utility revenues but provides no basis for that claim. Council votes 3-0 to give Southeastern Gas Engineering $41,000 to “get the project ready for bids.” Total loan amounts and overall project costs should be revealed during May council meeting.
Councilman Craig knows about the “poop burning equipment” because he’s involved in negotiations with HERO Biomass, the company that manufactures such equipment, about moving into one of LaFayette’s empty industrial buildings. The feasibility of this utility project is questionable – Arnold’s numbers probably assume a lot more customers than the city will actually gain, but without seeing his basis for the claims we can’t say for sure. Based on previous experience and observation we expect the city to have major cost overruns due to poor planning and probably not finish the upgrade for five or six years, likely resulting in a price increase for existing gas customers – and there’s no guarantee the chicken houses won’t be poop-burners (or still open) by the time gas lines reach them.
Last September library construction was scheduled to begin in May, that date has now been moved back to this September. Hopefully the dates won’t keep shifting since every delay represents more expense. We can also hope that their estimates for the project’s overall cost don’t grow along with the date changes.
Phase I of the $300,000+ project, which began in October, replaced sidewalks and added new streetlights and planter beds along East Patton Street between the downtown square and the Covrthovse on Duke Street. Phase II will see similar changes made on West Patton between the square to Cherokee Street, on Villanow St. between Duke and Main, and up Main Street towards Joe Stock Park. No word on when the project will be completely done, but as this is written in May we’re not even halfway to completion. Work was temporarily halted around the holidays to minimize disruption for downtown businesses, but many in that part of town have gotten frustrated with their customers having to walk over boards to access stores and offices.
The new sidewalks and street lights will look great once the job is done, similar to downtown Chickamauga, but the appearance of downtown isn’t as big a problem as the issue two councilmen pointed out – we don’t have enough parking spots already, and Phase II of the project will take away as many spots on the West side as Phase I took away on the East. Without parking spots people won’t come downtown to shop, eat, or do unnecessary business no matter how good the sidewalks look.
Instead of spending more money on sidewalks and planters, the city should invest into commercial real estate and turn an eyesore into a convenience. The old Walker Messenger building on the corner of Duke and Patton has no historical significance since it was built in the 1960s, plus it’s ugly and outdated – making it into parking would be convenient for courthouse visitors during the day and double the number of spots available for business customers in the evening and at night. The building has been listed for sale several years – LaFayette’s city fathers should work out a deal with News Publishing Co. (the property owner) and give downtown merchants what they need most: a place for their customers to park.
Every council meeting it becomes clearer and clearer that the council’s number 1 priority is the golf course. Why does a truck totaled by Animal Control lead to a new vehicle for the golf course? Animal control provides a valuable service to LaFayette taxpayers and probably drives more miles each week than a golf course truck that just goes back and forth from the golf course, the post office, to lunch, and to somebody’s home every night.
The council’s priorities are also shown in the way they debated for so long over $63 a few moments after approving projects that will cost the city $41- and $45-THOUSAND dollars without blinking an eye. They additionally showed how little concern they have for local businesses when they chose a Dalton truck dealer over Jackson Chevrolet for a difference of only $2,000. Jackson pays city and county taxes and employs more than one local resident – that two-grand won’t be much of anything compared to what the city will lose if the Jacksons pack up and leave town. The truck is a waste, but if they have to buy it it ought to be bought from the LaFayette dealership. This is the second meeting in a row councilmen have voted for buy a vehicle from a non-local dealer.
The softball field project is absolutely endless. It began in early 2008, has been moved twice, and has exceeded its original budget by more than 400%. Fields were supposed to open last April, then last June, and by the February meeting the city had set a goal of having them usable by this April. It’s good they wanted to save money on gravel for the parking lot, but saving money on the project should have been considered before they spent over $900,000 of city road money to build three softball fields in a swamp. More on this in future meeting notes – LaFayette’s softball field debacle is hardly over.
Back in January the Underground suggested LaFayette get a second drop-in spreader for emergencies. Meeting comments also clarify questions asked here about why the city ran sweepers a week after the snow – although it’s still unclear why they did such a spotty, slow job in actually sweeping up the gravel and sand if the plan was to reuse it. There’s still some out there on side streets nearly four months after the snow melted.
Bill Craig comments that 100 people had played golf the previous sunday and many had to walk due to carts not working. Conversation breaks out and many city employees (including Craig and Mayor Florence) say they played a game over the weekend.
Continual investment into the golf course is throwing money down a black hole. By the time the city breaks even on its new golf cart batteries the worn-out carts will need replacement. Instead of continually chasing its tail, the city needs to privatize or shut down the course. Discussions between city employees about how many of them played reenforces what the Underground has said all along – the course is just a toy for the councilmen and city employees that provides little benefit to the city as a whole. It’s great that 100 people played in a single day, but if a majority of those players were city employees that means a good number of those players didn’t pay for their game.
As previously noted, the city only inflated its snow removal costs in order to get FEMA money. Now that the FEMA funds are unlikely to appear, city has reasons to cut back on its estimated costs to something more acceptable for taxpaying citizens.
Barwick-LaFayette Airport is supposed to be a draw for businesses, but in this case it might interfere with a potential employer moving into town. FAA rules that block buildings near the airport from rising above a certain point may discourage HERO from using the old Otting facility, costing LaFayette a promised 100+ jobs. Since the February meeting there has been no further mention of HERO or the Otting facility.
Documentation: Official City of LaFayette Minutes From 12/14/11 Meeting
In this article, the Underground made the following prediction: “Continual investment into the golf course is throwing money down a black hole. By the time the city breaks even on its new golf cart batteries the worn-out carts will need replacement.”
And we were right.
WQCH, 12/13/11:
“THE LAFAYETTE GOLF COURSE WILL HAVE 60 NEW GOLF CARTS BY JANUARY 15th. THE LAFAYETTE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE CONTRACT WITH EZ-GO, AT MONDAY NIGHT’S MEETING.
THE DEAL CALLS FOR THE GOLF COURSE TO TRADE-IN THE 56 CARTS NOW IN SERVICE…THAT FLEET IS 6 YEARS OLD. RATES AT THE COURSE WERE INCREASED SLIGHTLY TO HELP PAY FOR THE NEW CARTS. THERE WILL BE 36 MONTHLY PAYMENTS OF $5,338… FOR A PACKAGE-TOTAL OF JUST OVER $192-THOUSAND DOLLARS. THE CONTRACT INCLUDES 3 YEARS MAINTENANCE ON THE CART FLEET.
IN DISCUSSION, NEW COUNCILMAN BEN BRADFORD NOTED THAT CART RENTAL IS THE LARGEST PROFIT ITEM FOR THE GOLF COURSE… SO AS HE PUT IT: “YOU HAVE TO SPEND MONEY TO MAKE MONEY”. THE LOCAL COURSE IS NOT COMPLETELY SELF-SUPPORTING, HOWEVER. COUNCILMAN BILL CRAIG SAID THE CITY SUPPLEMENTS THE COURSE OPERATION BY ABOUT 40-THOUSAND DOLLARS EACH YEAR.”
$12,600 worth of batteries down a giant black hole.
— LU
“you have to spend money to make money”
Maybe Bluebird will hear about the new carts, and come back to LaFayette!!